Part
of the Series,
Part Two by Pastor Bob Stone |
|||
![]() |
|||
Let us view a particular church. This church, by many standards, would have been considered outstanding. The grace of God was very evident, and the people had been enriched in every way. There was great knowledge in their speaking, and their testimony about Christ was confirmed in them in an obvious way. It was said of the church that they did not lack any specific gift; all the gifts were in operation in the community, and they also had an eager expectation for the coming of Christ. Doesn�t this sound like a church that would be a joy to pastor or attend? The church, on the contrary, also had unbelievable problems that would cause a pastor or leader to want to run. There were fights and divisions; you could not even address these people as spiritual. They were like a bunch of children. In addition, they were giving their founding pastor a horrible time and even tolerating incest in their midst. Interestingly, for some reason this church was so pathetic it was proud of its spiritual condition. Well, this could be said of many churches today, but as you may have already guessed, it was the church in Corinth. The whole scene is described in detail in 1 Cor. 1-6. In this lesson, we will concentrate on how Paul instructed them; in particular, as to their disobedience to Matt. 18:15-20. This will give us great insight into why this process is so needed in churches today. In order to understand what the Corinthians should have done, let�s quickly review the Matthew passage, and then return to 1 Cor. 5. The Steps of Reconciliation listed in Matthew 18:15-17The Context of this passage is The Parable of the Lost SheepMatt. 18:12-14.The Problem simply stated is: "A Brother Sins Against You..."v. 15.The Solution: What is the answer?The summary of the steps is:
Why be so harsh? It may be anything but harsh if the offender finally responds and repents. At the heart of Matthew 18:15-17 is love. The purpose of all four steps is to bring the offender to his/her senses; to help them escape the trap of sin they have fallen into; and to be restored to a living and vital relationship with Christ and His body. In addition, 1 Corinthians 5 gives us another reason why Matthew 18 is so vital. In 1 Corinthians, we see what will happen when a congregation fails to obey the clear commands of Matthew 18. The results of disobedience are far-reaching in their impact.The following will happen when Matthew 18 is ignored. There will be an infiltration of sin into the whole church.
Paul was trying to explain that sin unrepented and unconfronted is like yeast working its way through the whole batch of dough. v. 6"Your boasting is not good. Don�t you know that a little yeast (sin) works through the whole batch of dough (the church)?" In other words, sin starts small, but if allowed to continue, it will grow in its impact. Eventually, every part of the church is affected. The result is that some churches are thus rendered ineffective and contaminated because the church refuses to deal with the sin. Verse 7 expands on this, pointing out that unrepentant sin can cause the church to live far below its potential and, in a real sense, cause the believers of that church to disregard or treat lightly what Christ has accomplished on the cross. Here�s the command: "Get rid of the old yeast (sin) that you may be a new batch without yeast�as you really are. For Christ our Passover lamb has been sacrificed"v. 7. Paul drew upon the Passover, a supper celebrated by all Jews in remembrance of their deliverance from Egypt. A Jew was very familiar with every part of the meal. Paul was declaring to the Corinthians that Jesus should be seen as their Passover lamb, because He was sacrificed that they might apply His blood to their sins. In other words, as the Jews in Egypt applied the blood of the perfect lamb to the doorpost of their house, so Jesus� blood was to be applied to their sin, so they wouldn�t receive the penalty of their sin: death. If the Corinthians ignored the work of Christ, they were showing disregard for the sacrifice of Jesus. In the middle of the controversy, there seems to have been a disregard for who Jesus is, and what He came to do. The more basic question then became, "Are they going to disregard what Jesus did on the cross ?" If they allowed sin to continue unchecked, they were treating lightly and showing no appreciation for Christ�s sacrifice, and the power of His blood to cleanse sin�1 Cor. 6:9-11. That's why Paul went on to remind them in verse 7 that in the Passover meal, the Christians should be likened unto the unleavened bread of the Passover feast "...a new batch without yeast (that's what they) really are..." Just as any Jew would never think of celebrating Passover with bread that had yeast in it, so they were not to allow sin to continue unchecked in their church. They were to get rid of the yeast of the old life. (See 1 Cor. 6:9-20.) This is why Paul continued to elaborate on the Passover theme with a challenge in v. 8"Therefore, let us keep the festival, not with the old yeast, the yeast of malice and wickedness, but bread without yeast, the bread of sincerity and truth."
The Corinthian Christians who had Jewish backgrounds really understood what Paul was saying, and now so should we. If the Corinthians chose to ignore this instruction, what kind of sin would be present in their church? Verses 6-7 and the previous paraphrases show very clearly the results. Paul said there would not only be general infiltration and contamination, but in particular: There will be unchecked impurity and/or open sin increasing in the individuals in the congregation.In Paul's words, because the people of the Corinthian church did not follow Christ�s instruction, malice and wickedness would increase in the church. The malice of the offenders will be like yeast. Malice means badness, and generally includes every form of evil, physical and moral. What an awful prospect for the Corinthians! Paul said their wickedness would also be like yeast. Wickedness means about the same thing as malice... delighting in evil, the wicked acts of the mind. That�s the effect of unchecked sin. It not only destroys the individual(s) it starts in; it is also like a highly contagious virus that spreads rapidly through the congregation, so subtle it won't be noticed at first. Soon, however, it will work into people�s lives. Those who haven�t had a problem with malice and wickedness will, and many will succumb to it. We can see then that it�s in everyone�s best interest to obey the command of Jesus. The Matthew 18 process is designed to protect us, by stopping the spread of sin's virus. The yeast of sin will also prevent the church from eating of the bread of sincerity and truth. Sincerity means "clearness, pureness, genuineness." Truth means "the veritable essence of a matter..." the true picture of things. Can you imagine a church that loses its clearness, pureness, and genuineness; and the true picture of things is lost under a covering of deception? Again, we see Christ�s command in Matthew 18 is to protect and provide for us. A spiritual leader will have to publicly address individual sins because individual members are unwilling to obey.Why was Paul publicly addressing the sin of the man found in 1 Corinthians 5? He bypassed the first three steps of Christ�s command, because no one was willing to take even the first step to reconciliation. When the congregation refuses to take its responsibility, the leader must publicly and directly confront the sinful person. This is often the case in churches today too, but it is not the best or most biblical course of action. When Matthew 18 is ignored, it is a sign of defeat and disobedience in a congregation as a whole. The instruction of Matthew 18 intends that the members of the congregation would watch out for each other. Why bring a person�s sins to the group before the individual involved has had a chance to be confronted and work it out privately? Why risk misunderstanding or emotional responses, both good and bad? It is much more effective on a one-to-one basis to show concern and love by confronting the sinner privately. It allows for a much more efficient, personal, and loving means of communication and follow-up. The congregation's obedience to Matthew 18 also allows the pastor to concentrate on what God intends him to do, and that is to pray and equip the saints to do the work of the ministry. Sadly, many have conflicting expectations of the pastor/spiritual leaders of a church.
Others want the pastors to be the chief confronters and correctors of the church, because they are aware of the pastor's limitations in knowing everything that is going on. They think they can probably hide their own sin. It is also much easier to expect, even demand, that the pastor take care of all confrontation in fellow attenders and members of the church, because its member never have to admonish one another, risking misunderstanding and the loss of a friendship. But is this what God intends? Galatians 6:1 and Matthew 18 say, "if a brother sins against you..." or, "if a brother (or sister) is caught in a sin..." That places the responsibility on anyone who sees unconfessed sin in another believer. If, on the other hand, we all take responsibility for what we know, the outcome will be very beneficial. This process will change the content of church services and the pastor�s role, and will place the caring and gentle confrontation of each sinning member in the hands of those (for the most part) who are closest to him. We need to have the positive side of godly confrontation clearly in mind. The positive reasons for obedience to Christ�s teaching in Matthew are very exciting.Gossip, slander, and divisions will be drastically lessened in the church.Second Corinthians 12:20 shows us the result of disobedience"For I am afraid that when I come I may not find you as I want you to be, and you may not find me as you want me to be. I fear that there may be quarreling, jealousy, outbursts of anger, factions, slander, gossip, arrogance and disorder." (Wouldn�t it be fun to be part of this church?) Obedience to Christ�s command will eliminate this state of disorder, because differences and hurts will be handled Christ�s way. There will be a maintenance of purity in the body.There will be more purity in our actions. As Paul puts it in 1 Cor. 5:8, "there will be the sharing together of the bread of sincerity and truth." As we saw, that means clearness, pureness, genuineness, and no deception as to the true picture of things. In addition, there will be purity in church relationships. Those who are living impure lives will be gently confronted and led to repentance. Those who are unrepentant will be removed, e.g., 1 Cor. 5. In addition, those who are Christians and living impure lives will not be associated with.
The Christians in the congregation will be more careful to weigh their actions, attitudes and relationships, and thus have a healthy fear.They have seen the results of those in the church who participated in unrepentant sin. Any time there is correction in the body, it will cause others to take a warning (e.g. Acts 5:1-11Ananias and Sapphira; and 1 Tim. 5:19-21the elder who sins). What does this kind of correction say to the members of the congregation? They know they will lovingly be held accountable for their actions, not only from the preaching and teaching up front and by the conviction of the Holy Spirit, but also by their fellow brothers and sisters in Christ. Therefore, disputes between Christians will be handled quickly (1 Cor. 6:1-8) and marriages will improve1 Cor. 7:1-40. Our church has sadly had to take the Matthew 18 process through the fourth step twice. The positive side was that many who were wavering in their commitment to their mates or in obedience to Scripture, quickly took the initiative to repent of their own sinful lives. Closely related to that:
|
|||
Copyright � 2006 EagleFlight.org � 125 N.E. 185th St. � Shoreline, WA 98155
Comments/questions about this site? Contact Us